p. 7−17
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 18−23
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 24−33
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
0.0005), /u/ (7.29±17.83) (P=0.178) in the mentioned signal to noise ratio. There was a significant difference between recognition of these consonants at the end of the syllable with the vowel /e/ (75.00±24.73) (P=0.008), /a/ (64.58±24.09) (P=0.002), /â/ (47.39±24.32) (P=0.006), /i/ (79.68±24.54) and /o/ (60.93±28.67) (P>0.0005) in the mentioned signal to noise ratio. Moreover, there was a significant difference in recognition of these consonants at the beginning of the word in the signal to noise ratio of zero between men and women (p=0.039). The women was higher than men. Conclusion: Increased babble noise levels significantly reduce the recognition score of nasal consonants, and average recognition score of nasal consonants in noise related to gender in the signal to noise ratio of zero.]]>
p. 34−41
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 42−54
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 55−63
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 64−73
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 74−82
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 83−92
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3
p. 93−103
2345-2730
Vol.5/No.3