Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation

Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation

A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury Regarding Interpersonal and Social Relationship Transformations Post-Injury

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Fariba Mahooti 1
Ghoncheh Raheb 2
Fardin Alipour 2
Nikta Hatamizadeh 3
1 Department of Social Work. School of Paramedical Sciences and Rehabilitation. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Mashhad. Iran
2 Department of Social Work, University of rehabilitation sciences and Social Health, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Rehabilitation Management, University of rehabilitation sciences and Social Health, Tehran, Iran
10.22038/jpsr.2026.88779.2722
Abstract
Purpose:
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is an unexpected event that imposes numerous biopsychosocial consequences on individuals. These consequences affect mental health and well-being, transform personal, familial, and social roles, and significantly impact interpersonal, family, and social relationships. The present study aims to explore the transformations and changes in interpersonal and social relationships following SCI and to examine individuals' lived experiences of these changes.
Methods:
A qualitative research method was employed to understand these experiences. The study included a total of 11 individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and 2 family members, selected through purposive sampling until data saturation was achieved. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis.
Results:
The analysis revealed that the experiences of individuals with SCI regarding their social and interpersonal relationships could be categorized into 3 main themes and 9 subthemes. The primary themes were: Disruption in family system equilibrium, Reduced social belonging and Preference for peer relationships.
Conclusion:
Addressing the changes in interpersonal relationships and assisting both individuals and their families in adapting to these changes can significantly enhance personal growth and psychosocial adjustment.
Keywords
Qualitative Study
Spinal cord injury patients
Relationship dynamics
Social and interpersonal relations
Subjects
  1. Silva FAR, Barbosa MA, Prudente COM, Morais LA, et al. Health literacy of people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2023; 61(8): 409-414.
  2. Razzaghi V, Ostadhashemi L, Arshi M, Sabzi Khoshnami M. Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers of Social Integration of Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries in Rofeideh Rehabilitation Hospital: A Qualitative Study. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2023; 23(4): 482-501.
  3. Baniya M, Kitrungrote L, Damkliang J. Prevalence, severity, and self-management of depressive mood among community-dwelling people with spinal cord injury in Nepal. Belitung Nurs J. 2022; 8(2):101-107.
  4. Singh V, Mitra S. Psychophysiological impact of spinal cord injury: Depression, coping and heart rate variability. J Spinal Cord Med. 2023; 46(3): 441-449.
  5. Budd MA, Gater DR, Jr., Channell I. Psychosocial Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(7).
  6. Mahooti F, Raheb G, Alipour F, Hatamizadeh N. Psychosocial challenges of social reintegration for people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Spinal Cord. 2020; 58(10): 1119-1127.
  7. Makkar V, Pandurangi A, Makkar V, Hani U, et al. Psychological Well-being and Quality of Life for Patients with Stable Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2025; 15(1): 43-48.
  8. Stenimahitis V, Holmgren AG, Gharios M, El-Hajj VG, et al. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a qualitative interview-based study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2026; 12(1).
  9. Hearn JH, Rohn EJ, Monden KR. Isolated and anxious: A qualitative exploration of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals living with spinal cord injury in the UK. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022; 45(5): 691-699.
  10. Giroux EE, Athanasopoulos P, Sweet SN, Gainforth HL. A case study of using community-based consensus methods to facilitate shared decision-making among a spinal cord injury network. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5: 1335467.
  11. Buckelew SP, Frank RG, Elliott TR, Chaney J, Hewett J. Adjustment to spinal cord injury: stage theory revisited. Paraplegia. 1991; 29(2): 125-130.
  12. Fekete C, Reinhardt JD, Arora M, Patrick Engkasan J, et al. Socioeconomic status and social relationships in persons with spinal cord injury from 22 countries: Does the countries' socioeconomic development moderate associations? PLoS One. 2021; 16(8): e0255448.
  13. Cimino SR, Cadel L, Guilcher SJT, Wasilewski M, Hitzig SL. Social disconnectedness and perceived social isolation in persons with spinal cord injury/dysfunction living in the community: A scoping review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2023; 46(3): 367-389.
  14. Filipcic T, Sember V, Pajek M, Jerman J. Quality of Life and Physical Activity of Persons with Spinal Cord Injury. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17): 9148.
  15. Fekete C, Tough H, Arora M, Hasnan N, et al. Are Social Relationships an Underestimated Resource for Mental Health in Persons Experiencing Physical Disability? Observational Evidence from 22 Countries. Int J Public Health. 2021; 66: 619823.
  16. Bourke JA, Nunnerley JL, Sullivan M, Derrett S. Relationships and the transition from spinal units to community for people with a first spinal cord injury: A New Zealand qualitative study. Disabil Health J. 2019; 12(2): 257–262.
  17. Amsters D, Schuurs S, Pershouse K, Power B, et al. Factors Which Facilitate or Impede Interpersonal Interactions and Relationships after Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review with Suggestions for Rehabilitation. Rehabil Res Pract. 2016; 2016: 9373786.
  18. Corbin JM, Strauss, A.L. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 3rd ed. ed: Sage Publications; 2008.
  19. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9): 1277-1288.
  20. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods 4th ed. ed: Sage Publications.; 2015.
  21. Guest G, Bunce, A., Johnson, L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006; 18(1), 59-82.
  22. Iman MT, Noushadi MR. Qualitative Content Analysis. J Res Islamic Sci. 2011; 3(2).
  23. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(2): 105-112.
  24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159-174.
  25. Lincoln YS, Guba, E.G. Naturalistic inquiry: Sage Publications; 1985.
  26. Trierveiler KS, Ferreira RF, Ramos S, Schoeller SD, et al. Family functioning of people with spinal cord injury. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem. 2015; 24(4).
  27. Cleveland M. Family Adaptation to Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Response to Crisis. Family Relations. 1980; 29(4):558-565.
  28. Lynch J, Cahalan R. The impact of spinal cord injury on the quality of life of primary family caregivers: a literature review. Spinal Cord. 2017; 55(11): 964-978.
  29. Abedi H, Hossenigolafshani SZ, Ahmadi F. Reflection on the Experiences of Disabled People: The Society as a Cause of Growth or Barrier. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2013; 2(3):248–260.
  30. Hess MJ, Hough S. Impact of spinal cord injury on sexuality: broad-based clinical practice intervention and practical application. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012; 35(4):211-218.
  31. Eglseder K, Demchick B. Sexuality and Spinal Cord Injury: The Lived Experiences of Intimate Partners. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2017; 37(3):125-131.
  32. Leiulfsrud, Annelie Schedin, et al. "Experienced inclusion and recognition amongst people with spinal cord injury: A comparative study in Norway, The Netherlands, and Australia." Plos one 20.4 (2025): e0306231.‏
  33. Braaf S, Lennox A, Nunn A, Gabbe B. Social activity and relationship changes experienced by people with bowel and bladder dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017; 55(7):679-686.
  34. Mitchell LL, Johnsen-Buss E. Identity development among veterans with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Rehabil Psychol. 2025; 70(4): 415-425.
  35. Khanjani MS, Khankeh HR, Younesi SJ, Azkhosh M. The Main Factors Affecting the Acceptance and Adaptation with Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Study. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2019; 19(4): 276-291.
  36. Hoffmann DD, Sundby J, Biering-Sørensen F, Kasch H. Implementing volunteer peer mentoring as a supplement to professional efforts in primary rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2019; 57(10): 881-889.
  37. Houlihan BV, Jette A, Friedman RH, Paasche-Orlow M, et al. A pilot study of a telehealth intervention for persons with spinal cord dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2013; 51(9): 715-720.
  38. Ljungberg I, Kroll T, Libin A, Gordon S. Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self-efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications. J Clin Nurs. 2011; 20(3-4): 351-358.
  39. Wedege P, Divanoglou A, Abrahamsen FE, Mæland S. 'We're all on the same journey; some are just a bit further down the road than others': a qualitative study exploring peer mentors' experiences in Active Rehabilitation camps for individuals with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2025; 47(9): 2366-2377.
Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 15, Issue 2
Summer 2026
Pages 119-133