Investigation of Formant Structure in Azeri Language Vowels in Azeri Adults Aged 18-24 Years Old

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Speech Therapy , faculty of rehabilitation, Tehran university of medical science, Tehran,Iran

2 Department of Speech Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

3 Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Semnan University of Medical Science, Semnan, Iran

4 Department of Speech Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Formant structure is the most important acoustic characteristic of vowels and the vowel is the main center of syllables. Therefore, an investigationof their formants structure is of great importance.The aim of the present study was to investigate the nine Azeri vowel's formants. 
Methods:
The present study was a cross-sectional and descriptive-analytic study. The participants of this study were 50 (25 males-25 females) students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences with their age ranging from 18-24 years old. The fundamental frequency (F0) of /a/ and /i/ vowels and the first, second, and third formants (F1, F2, F3) of nine Azeri vowels were determined with using Praat software. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software. When the data were normally distributed, independent t-test was used. Otherwise, Mann-Whitney test was used.
Results:
F0 of /a/ and /i/ vowels are significantly higher in females than males. /æ/ and /i/ vowels in the both sexes, respectively, have the most and least F1. The most F2 in the both sexes is /i/ and the least F2 in male /æ/ and in females is /o/. Also, in both sexes, the most F3 is /i/ vowel and the least F3 is /ø/ vowel.
Conclusion:
/æ/ and /i/ vowels in the both sexes, respectively, are the most open and closed vowels. /i/ vowel in the both sexes and /æ/ in males and /o/ in females respectively, are the most front and most back vowels. The roundest vowel in Azeri is /ø/ and the most spread vowel is /i/.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Samareh y. persian phonetics, phones and syllable structure. university publication center 1999; 2 : 8-9.
  2. Johnson K. Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Phonetica 2004; 61(1): 56-8.
  3. Peña-Brooks A, Hegde MN. Assessment and treatment of articulation and phonological disorders in children: a dual-level text: Pro-ed; 2007.
  4. Ball MJ, Gröne B, Ball M, Code C. Imaging techniques. Instrumental clinical phonetics 1997: 194-227
  5. Boone dr, Mcfarlane sc, Von berg sl, Zraick ri. The voice and voice therapy 2005; 23.
  6. Yunusova y, Weismer g, Westbury jr, Lindstrom mj. Articulatory movements during vowels in speakers with dysarthria and healthy controls. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2008; 51(3): 596-611.
  7. Ladefoged p, Johnson k. A Course in Phonetics (5th). Thomson Wadsworth  2006: 123.
  8. Tatham M, Ladfoged P. Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. International Phonetic Association Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2009; 39(2): 235.
  9. Caruso AJ, Strand EA. Clinical management of motor speech disorders in children: Thieme New York; 1999: 45.
  10. Hillenbrand J, Getty LA, Clark MJ, Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical society of America 1995; 97(5): 309.
  11. Lee S, Potamianos A, Narayanan S. Acoustics of children’s speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999; 105(3): 1455-68.
  12. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical measurement of speech and voice: Cengage Learning; 2000: 43.
  13. Singh R, Gencaga D, Raj B, editors. Formant manipulations in voice disguise by mimicry. Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF), 2016 4th International Workshop on; 2016: IEEE.
  14. Hagino A, Inohara K, Sumita YI, Taniguchi H. Investigation of the factors influencing the outcome of prostheses on speech rehabilitation of mandibulectomy patients. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 2008; 52(4): 543-9.
  15. Mohammadi O. Determining and comparison of the Persian vowel formants in 18-22 years adults and 7-9 years children: Dissertation]. Tehran (Iran): Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2005.
  16. Peterson GE, Barney HL. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the acoustical society of America 1952; 24(2):175-84.
  17. Kent R, Forner L. Developmental study of vowel formant frequencies in an imitation task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1979; 65(1): 208-17.
  18. Dehqan A, Ansari H, Bakhtiar M. Objective voice analysis of Iranian speakers with normal voices. Journal of Voice 2010; 24(2): 161-7.
  19. Izadi F, Mohseni R, Daneshi A, Sandughdar N. Determination of fundamental frequency and voice intensity in Iranian men and women aged between 18 and 45 years. Journal of Voice. 2012;26(3):336-40.
  20. Mohammadi H, Mohammadi R, Torabinezhad F, Rezaei M. Formant structure and vowel space in Persian vowels. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011; 20(2): 79-85.
  21. Mozaffarzadeh Peivasti. An acoustic analysis of Azerbaijani vowels in Tabrizi dialect. Journal of Basic and AppliedScientific Research 2012; 2(7): 7181-4.
  22. Torabi MA. Azarbaijani and TEFL (A Contrastive Linguistic Approach To TEFL To Azarbaijani Bilinguals). Tabriz University Press; 2002: 23.
  23. Salehi F, Bahrami A, Torabinezhad F, Kamali M. The Persian vowel formants in normal, moderate and severe hearing impaired students age 7-9 years in Isfahan. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009; 17(2): 42-52.
  24. Mokari PG, Werner S. An acoustic description of spectral and temporal characteristics of Azerbaijani vowels. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 2016; 52(3): 503-18.
  25. Farzane M. Azerbaijan basics of grammar: sounds and words. shams publication 1964: 65.
  26. Dehgan A, Gilani A, Ansari mogadam A, Abdekhoda K, jalilian Y. objective voice analysis of young iranian girls and boys 2013; 1(1): 52-60.
  27. Casper JK, Leonard R. Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 54.
  28. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1. 03)[Computer program]. Retrieved March 21, 2009. 2009.
  29. Toran K, Lal B. Objective analysis of voice in normal young adults. Kathmandu University Medical Journal 2009; 7(4): 374-7.

Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 7, Issue 2
May 2018
Pages 30-36

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics