Comparison of Electromyographic Activity of Selected Lower Extremity Muscles During ‎Front and Right Lunge Movements Between Female Amateur and Professional ‎Badminton Players

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Sport Injury and Corrective Exercise, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran

Abstract

Purpose:
It has been reprted that there are differences between amateur and professional players in terms of kinetics of movement and the amount of foot pressure during lunge movement. The aim of the present study was to investigate the electromyographic difference of selected lower limb muscles during lunge movement in two groups of amateur and professional individuals.
Methods:
Ten amateur badminton players and 10 professional female badminton players were recruited based on convenience sampling method (professional group: age 18.06±0.99 years, height 165.2±5.45 cm and weight 57.5±2.79 kg and amateur group age 20.78±1.80 years, height 165.00±6.69 cm and weight 55.50±5.50 kg). The EMG (16 channel, Wireless, made by MYON, Switzerland) machine was used to record electrical activity of tibialis anterior, proneus longus, medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius, vastus medialis, and vastus lateralis muscles. Subjects in both groups performed lunge movement and the values RMS of selected muscles were derived from EMG records at 100 ms before foot initial contact to force plate and 100-200 ms after that. Data analysis was performed by using independent t and Man-Whitney tests by setting significance level at P value less than 0.05.
Results:
In comparison with professional group, amateur group had lower values before initial contact the electrical activity of tibialis anterior muscle (P=0.006) and after initial contact the electrical activity of proneus longus (P=0.002) muscle. There was no significant differences among other muscle’s activities (P>0.005(.
Conclusion:
By decreasing the activity of tibialis anterior muscle the before initial contact phase and decreasing the activity of the proneus longus muscle in the after initial contact phase of amateur badminton players, it can be stated that Amateur athletes are more susceptible to ankle sprains and need to design strenuous exercises.

Keywords


  1. Phomsoupha M, Laffaye G. The science of badminton: game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Med 2015; 45(4): 473-495.
  2. Shariff A, George J, Ramlan A. Musculoskeletal injuries among Malaysian badminton players. Singapore Med J  2009; 50(11): 1095.
  3. Jørgensen U, Winge S. Epidemiology of badminton injuries. Inte J Sports Med 1987; 8(06): 379-382.
  4. Krøner K, Schmidt S, Nielsen A, Yde J, Jakobsen B, Møller-Madsen B, et al. Badminton injuries. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24(3): 169-172.
  5. Lee J-h, Yoo W-g. Treatment of chronic Achilles tendon pain by Kinesio taping in an amateur badminton player. Phys Ther Sport 2012; 13(2): 115-119.
  6. Robinson G, O’Donoghue P. A movement classification for the investigation of agility demands and injury risk in sport. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2008; 8(1): 127-144.
  7. Mei Q, Gu Y, Fu F, Fernandez J. A biomechanical investigation of right-forward lunging step among badminton players. J Sports Sci 2017; 35(5): 457-462.
  8. Hong Y, Wang SJ, Lam WK, Cheung JT-M. Kinetics of badminton lunges in four directions.J Appl Biomech 2014; 30(1): 113-118.
  9. Kuntze G, Mansfield N, Sellers W. A biomechanical analysis of common lunge tasks in badminton. J Sports Sci 2010; 28(2): 183-191.
  10. Yu L. Leveled badminton players present different footwork kinetics response. J Sports Sci Med 2017; 20: 32.
  11. Hu X, Li JX, Hong Y, Wang L. Characteristics of plantar loads in maximum forward lunge tasks in badminton. PloS One 2015; 10(9): e0137558.
  12. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10(5): 361-374.
  13. Konrad P. The abc of emg. A practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography. Noraxon Inc. USA, version 1.0 April 2005.: 30-35.
  14. Huang M-T, Lee H-H, Lin C-F, Tsai Y-J, Liao J-C. How does knee pain affect trunk and knee motion during badminton forehand lunges? J Sports Sci 2014; 32(7): 690-700.
  15. Lam WK, Lee KK, Park SK, Ryue J, et al. Understanding the impact loading characteristics of a badminton lunge among badminton players. PloS One 2018; 13(10): e0205800.
  16. Pourheidary S, Sheikhhoseini R, Babakhani F. A Comparison of the Hamstring to Quadriceps Activation Ratio in the Toe-in or Neutral Toe Position After Triple Jump Spikes in Female Volleyball Players. J Clin Res Paramed Sci 2019; 8(2): e88016.
  17. Löfvenberg R, Kärrholm J, Sundelin G, Ahlgren O. Prolonged reaction time in patients with chronic lateral instability of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23(4): 414-417.
  18. Osborne MD, Chou L-S, Laskowski ER, Smith J, Kaufman KR. The effect of ankle disk training on muscle reaction time in subjects with a history of ankle sprain. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29(5): 627-632.
  19. Mei Q, Chong A, Gu Y, Zheng Z, Fernande J, editors. A performance-related foot loading characters while performing lunging step among badminton players. In: 34rd International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS 2016), 18-22 July 2016 , Tsukuba, Japan.
  20. Jazayeri SS, Didehdar D, Moghtaderi AE. Tibial and peroneal nerve conduction studies in ankle sprain. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 47(6): 301-304.
  21. Konradsen L, Ravn JB. Ankle instability caused by prolonged peroneal reaction time. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61(5): 388-390.
  22. Fu L, Ren F, Baker JS. Comparison of joint loading in badminton lunging between professional and amateur badminton players. Appl Bionics Biomech 2017; 2017: 5397656.
  23. Ashton-Miller JA, Ottaviani RA, Hutchinson C, Wojtys EM. What best protects the inverted weightbearing ankle against further inversion? Evertor muscle strength compares favorably with shoe height, athletic tape, and three orthoses. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24(6): 800-809.
  24. Mitchell A, Dyson R, Hale T, Abraham C. Biomechanics of ankle instability. Part 1: Reaction time to simulated ankle sprain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40(8): 1515-1521.