The Effect of Age on the Alignment and Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine: A ‎Review Study

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

Department of Sports Injury and Corrective Exercises Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
The range of motion and alignment of the cervical spine in healthy people is influenced by various factors such as genetics and age. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age on the alignment and range of motion of the cervical spine.
Methods:
In this study, a comprehensive study on the effect of age on the alignment and range of motion of the cervical spine by searching in Google Scholar, PubMed and Sciencedirect databases with the keywords “Cervical Spine”, “Neck, Range of Motion”, “Cervical Alignment” , “Cervical Angle” and “Age-Related Change” and also in Persian databases of Google Scholar, Megapiper, Irandac, Mgiran, SID, MedLib, Iran Medax and Iran Science and Technology Research Institute with keywords “Neck,” “Cervical Spine”, “Range of Motion”, “Neck Alignment”, “Neck Angle” and “Age-Related Changes” were performed from 2000 to January 2021. After collecting the search results, first the title and then the abstract of the articles were studied. If the articles complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, their results were used in the review study, otherwise discarded.
Results:
In the search of texts, after deleting similar cases, 37 articles, with similar subject to our study, were selected. These studies mainly investigated the effect of age on range of motion and Cervical Alignment in healthy individuals.
Conclusion:
According to the results of studies, the range of motion in the cervical spine decreased with age, which of course does not follow a regular pattern because in some ages it increases and in some ages it decreases. Also, age has influence not only on the range of motion but also on the alignment of the cervical spine. Therefore, due to individual differences and people's lifestyles and occupations, it is very difficult to understand whether we always see an increase in cervical lordosis and a decrease in range of motion with age. Therefore, we should be cautious and should not draw a general rule for all people, so there is a need for more research in this area in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Hu L, Lv Y, Lin Y. Correlations and Age-Related Changes of Cervical Sagittal Parameters in Adults Without Symptoms of Cervical Spinal Disease. Spine 2020; 45(23): E1542-E1548.
  2. Schäfer AGM, Schöttker-Königer T, Hall TM, Mavroidis I,  et al. Upper cervical range of rotation during the flexion-rotation test is age dependent: an observational study. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. 2020; 12: 1-9.
  3. Chen Y, Luo J, Pan Z, Yu L, et al. The change of cervical spine alignment along with aging in asymptomatic population: a preliminary analysis. European Spine Journal 2017; 26(9): 2363-2371.
  4. Ezra D, Kalichman L, Simonovich A, Droujin J, et al. The association between cervical lordosis and age, sex, history of cervical trauma and sedentarity: A CT study. Arch Anat Physiol 2020; 5(1): 009-0015.
  5. Inoue T, Ito K, Ando K, Kobayashi K, et al. Age-related changes in upper and lower cervical alignment and range of motion: normative data of 600 asymptomatic individuals. European Spine Journal 2020; 29(9): 2378-2383.
  6. Been E, Shefi S, Soudack M. Cervical lordosis: the effect of age and gender. The Spine Journal 2017; 17(6): 880-888.
  7. Park MS, Moon S-H, Lee H-M, Kim SW, et al. The effect of age on cervical sagittal alignment: normative data on 100 asymptomatic subjects. Spine 2013; 38(8): E458-E463.
  8. Pan F, Arshad R, Zander T, Reitmaier S, et al. The effect of age and sex on the cervical range of motion–A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of biomechanics 2018; 75: 13-27.
  9. Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Maruiwa H, et al. Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2003; 99(1): 80-83.
  10. Sherekar S, Yadav Y, Basoor A, Baghel A, Adam N. Clinical implications of alignment of upper and lower cervical spine. Neurology India 2006; 54(3): 264-267.
  11. Park MS, Moon S-H, Lee H-M, Kim T-H, et al. Age-related changes in cervical sagittal range of motion and alignment. Global spine journal 2014; 4(3): 151-156.
  12. Kim HJ, Lenke LG, Oshima Y, Chuntarapas T, et al. Cervical lordosis actually increases with aging and progressive degeneration in spinal deformity patients. Spine Deformity 2014; 2(5): 410-414.
  13. Yokoyama K, Kawanishi M, Yamada M, Tanaka H, et al. Age-related variations in global spinal alignment and sagittal balance in asymptomatic Japanese adults. Neurological research. 2017; 39(5): 414-418.
  14. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, et al. Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. European Spine Journal 2018; 27(2): 426-432.
  15. Iorio J, Lafage V, Lafage R, Henry JK, et al. The effect of aging on cervical parameters in a normative North American population. Global spine journal 2018; 8(7): 709-715.
  16. Yeh K-T, Lee R-P, Chen H, Yu T-C, et al. Are there age-and sex-related differences in spinal sagittal alignment and balance among Taiwanese asymptomatic adults? Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2018; 476(5): 1010.
  17. Liu J, Liu P, Ma Z, Mou J, et al. The effects of aging on the profile of the cervical spine. Medicine. 2019; 98(7): e14425-14430.
  18. Wassilev W, Andreev D. Age Related Changes In The Cervical Backbone. Trakia Journal of Sciences 2019;17(2):109-112.
  19. Inoue T, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Nakashima H, et al. Age-Related Changes in T1 and C7 Slope and the Correlation Between Them in More Than 300 Asymptomatic Subjects. Spine  2021, 46.(8):  E474-E481.
  20. Tang R, Ivan BY, Cheung ZB, Kim JS, Cho SK-W. Age-related changes in cervical sagittal alignment: a radiographic analysis. Spine 2019; 44(19): E1144-E1150.
  21. Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, Albert TJ, et al. Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine 2016; 41(23): 1826-1836.
  22. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Ito K, et al. Age-related and degenerative changes in the osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine: a comparative study of radiographic data from 1016 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 1230 asymptomatic subjects. Spine 2016; 41(6): 476-482.
  23. Oe S, Togawa D, Nakai K, Yamada T, et al. The influence of age and sex on cervical spinal alignment among volunteers aged over 50. Spine. 2015; 40(19): 1487-1494.
  24. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2013; 19(2): 141-159.
  25. Boyle JJ, Milne N, Singer KP. Influence of age on cervicothoracic spinal curvature: an ex vivo radiographic survey. Clinical biomechanics 2002; 17(5): 361-367.
  26. Castro WH, Sautmann A, Schilgen M, Sautmann M. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex: an experimental examination. Spine 2000; 25(4): 443-449.
  27. Arbogast KB, Gholve PA, Friedman JE, Maltese MR, et al. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3–12 years old. Spine 2007; 32(10): E309-E315.
  28. Lansade C, Laporte S, Thoreux P, Rousseau M-A, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects. Spine 2009; 34(26): 2900-2906.
  29. Tommasi DG, Foppiani AC, Galante D, Lovecchio N, Sforza C. Active head and cervical range of motion: effect of age in healthy females. Spine 2009; 34(18): 1910-1916.
  30. Kuo Y-L, Tully EA, Galea MP. Video based measurement of sagittal range of spinal motion in young and older adults. Manual therapy 2009; 14(6): 618-622.
  31. Seacrist T, Saffioti J, Balasubramanian S, Kadlowec J, et al. Passive cervical spine flexion: the effect of age and gender. Clinical Biomechanics 2012; 27(4): 326-333.
  32. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T. Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. European Spine Journal 2012; 21(8): 1492-1498.
  33. Öhman AM, Beckung ER. A pilot study on changes in passive range of motion in the cervical spine, for children aged 0–5 years. Physiotherapy theory and practice 2013; 29(6): 60-67.
  34. Liu B, Wu B, Van Hoof T, Okito J-PK, et al. Are the standard parameters of cervical spine alignment and range of motion related to age, sex, and cervical disc degeneration? Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 2015; 23(3): 274-279.
  35. Salo PK, HÄkkinen AH, Kautiainen H, Ylinen JJ. Quantifying the effect of age on passive range of motion of the cervical spine in healthy working-age women. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy 2009; 39(6): 478-483.
  36. Passmore SR, Burke J, Lyons J. Older adults demonstrate reduced performance in a Fitts’ task involving cervical spine movement. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 2007; 24(4): 352-363.
  37. Doriot N, Wang X. Effects of age and gender on maximum voluntary range of motion of the upper body joints. Ergonomics 2006; 49(3): 269-281.
  38. Sforza C, Grassi G, Fragnito N, Turci M, Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clinical Biomechanics. 2002; 17(8): 611-614.
  39. Sahrmann S. Movement system impairment syndromes of the extremities, cervical and thoracic spines-e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010: 51-53.
  40. Locke SJ, Colt JS, Stewart PA, Armenti KR, et al. Identifying gender differences in reported occupational information from three US population-based case–control studies. Occupational and environmental medicine 2014; 71(12): 855-864.
  41. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2007; 39(9): 1502-1508.
  42. Cunha-Henriques S, Costa-Paiva L, Pinto-Neto AM, Fonsechi-Carvesan G, et al. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and musculoskeletal status: a comparative cross-sectional study. Journal of clinical medicine research 2011; 3(4): 168-176.
  43. Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, Pryor PW. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 1997; 22(13): 1472-1479.
Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 11, Issue 1
June 2022
Pages 109-122

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics