The Effects of Foot Structures on Plantar Pressure Characteristics in Overweight Girls ‎Aged 10-13 Years During Walking‎

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Sports Biomechanics, School of Sports Sciences, Bo Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Differences in foot structure are thought to be associated with differences in foot function during movement. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of foot structure on plantar pressure characteristics in overweight girl children aged 10-13 years during walking.
Methods:
Thirty-six overweight girls with pes planus, pes cavus and normal feet structures participated in this study. The plantar pressure characteristics of the subjects were measured using the foot-scan system while walking on a 14-meter gait-way at a self-selected speed. Peak plantar pressure, time to reach the peak pressure, percentage of the plantar contact area and impulse were measured. MANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test were used for statistical analyses at a significance level of 0.05.
Results:
The mean peak pressure of the left foot of the pes cavus group under the hallux (12.47) was greater than that of the normal (7.93) and pes planus (7.49) groups (p=0.035). The mean impulse underneath the 2-5 toes zone of the right foot of normal (0.86) group was greater than pes planus (0.49) group (p=0.008). The mean impulse also was greater under the hallux zone of the left foot among pes cavus group (2.61) than those in normal (0.89) and pes planus (0.88) groups (0.045).
Conclusion:
Despite the existence of minor differences; in general, the results of this study did not show a significant alteration in plantar pressure characteristics among overweight children with different foot structures during walking.

Keywords

References

  1. Bancroft RJ, McDnough T, Shakespeare J, Lynas K. Orthotics. Eur Geriatr Med 2011; 2(2): 122-125.
  2. Butterworth PA, Urquhart DM, Landorf KB, Wluka AE, et al. Foot posture, range of motion and plantar pressure characteristics in obese and non-obese individuals. Gait Posture 2015; 41(2): 465-469.
  3. Buldt AK, Forghani S, Londorf KB, Levinger P, et al. Foot posture is associated with plantar pressure during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture 2018; 62: 235-240.
  4. Collins N, Bisset L, McPoil T, Vicenzino B. Foot Orthoses in Lower Limb Overuse Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28: 396-410.
  5. Donatelli RA. The biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Philadephia, PA:F.A Davis company, 1996.
  6. Safar Cherati A, Soltani SK, Moghadam N, Hassanmirzaei B, et al. Is there a relationships between lower extremity injuries and foot postures in professional football players? A prospective cohort study. Sci Med Footb 2022; 6(1): 49-59.
  7. Hallemans A, De Clercq D, Van Dongen S, Aerts P. Changes in foot-functions parameters during the first 5 months after the onset of independent walking: a longitudinal follow-up study. Gait Posture 2006; 23(2): 142-148.
  8. Hertel J, Gay M, Denegar C. Differences in postural control during single-leg stance among healthy individuals with different foot types. J Athl Train 2002; 37(2):129-132.
  9. Song-hua Y, Kuan Zh, Gou-qing T, Jin Y, Zhi-cheng L. Effects of obesity on dynamic plantar pressure distribution in Chinese prepubescent children during walking. Gait Posture 2013; 37(1): 37-42.
  10. Chang J, Wang Sh, Kuo Ch, Shen HC, et al. Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169(4): 447-452.
  11. Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech 2004; 19(4): 391-397.
  12. Mortazavi SMJ, Ahmadi J, Shariati M. Prevalence of subjective poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields among university students. Bioelectromagnetics 2007; 28(4): 326-330.
  13. Molina-Garcia P, Miranda-Aparicio D, Molina-Molina A, Plaza-Florido A, et al. Effect of exercise on plantar pressure during walking in children with overweight/obesity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52(3): 654-662.
  14. Evans AM, Karimi L. The relationship between paediatric foot posture and body mass index: do heavier children really have flatter feet? J Foot Ankle Res 2015; 8:46.
  15. Song-hua Y, Lu W, Kuan Z. Effects of different movement modes on plantar pressure distribution patterns in obese and non-obese Chinese children. Gait Posture 2017; 57: 28-34.
  16. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2): 175-191.
  17. Hoffman M, Schrader J, Applegate T, Koceja D. Unilateral Postural Control of the Functionally Dominant and Nondominant Extremities of Healthy Subjects. J Athl Train 1998; 33(4): 319-322.
  18. Williams DS, McClay IS. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000; 80(9): 864-871
  19. Nantel J, Brochu M, Prince F. Locomotor strategies in obese and non-obese children. Obesity 2006; 14(10): 1789-1794.
  20. Stolzman S, Irby MB, Callahan AB, Skelton JA. Pes planus and paediatric obesity: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Obes 2015; 5(2): 52-59.
  21. Song-Hua Y, Lu W, Kuan Zh. Effects of different movement modes on plantar pressure distribution patterns in obese and non-obese Chinese children. Gait Posture 2017; 5: 28-34.
  22. Wong DW, Wang Y, Leung AK, Yang M, et al. Finite element simulation on posterior tibial tendinopathy: load transfer alteration and implications to the onset of pes planus. Clin Biomech 2018; 51: 10-16.
Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 12, Issue 4
February 2024
Pages 14-25

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics