Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Cotton mill workers in Baghdad, Iraq

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Geriatric Health, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Workers of cotton mills are at a higher risk for developing hearing loss because of risky high levels of noise environments. The most important effect is irreversible hearing loss due to damage to the sensory and neural organs of the ear. The study aimed to find the hearing loss rate among Baghdad Cotton mills.
Methods:
232 Cotton mill workers with a mean age of 40.1±5.6 years and a range of 28-50 years with male-to-female proportions (93.1% vs. 6.9%) participated in this cross-sectional study. They underwent pure tone audiometry at 0.5- 8 Khz and completed a questionnaire. Data were processed in SPSS using both descriptive and analytical methods, and the neural network approach was employed to identify key predictors.
Results:
The rate of Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (ONIHL) in cotton mill workers was 28.4% with M(SD)= 1.72(0.45) and 95% CI= 1.66, 1.77. There were highly significant associations between the increased age of cotton mill workers, (p<0.001), the longer working duration (p<0.001), the low educational level of cotton mills workers (p<0.001), a history of chronic diseases, and hearing loss (HL) (p=0.007), especially hypertension history (p=0.03) in cotton mills workers. No significant differences were noticed between cotton mill workers with and without HL regarding gender (p=0.37), smoking status (p=0.28), and smoking grades (p=0.34). Moreover, no significant effect of average working years was observed on the severity of left and right ears ONIHL (p>0.05).
Conclusion:
ONIHL is most common in a noisy workplace which is bluntly proportionate to the average working years. The use of hearing protection devices definite hearing conservation plan, and annually repeated audiometry should be made obligatory for the early detection and prevention of ONIHL to understand that it is permanent but preventable.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen K-H, Su S-B, Chen K-T. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environ Health Prev Med 2020; 25(1): 65.
  2. Abraham Z, Massawe E, Ntunaguzi D, Kahinga A, Mawala S. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss among textile industry workers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Ann Glob Health 2019; 85(1): 85.
  3. Levy BS. Occupational and environmental health: recognizing and preventing disease and injury: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
  4. Goelzer B. Hazard prevention and control programmes. Goelzer, B., Hansen, CH, Sehrndt, GA (Ed.). Occupational Exposure to Noise: Evaluation. Prevention and Control, WHO, Geneva 2001; 233: 244.
  5. Dube KJ, Ingale LT, Ingale ST. Hearing impairment among workers exposed to excessive levels of noise in ginning industries. Noise Health 2011; 13(54): 348-355.
  6. Hameed H, Eleue A, Hussein F. Noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) in wasit corporation textile industries. Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research 2019; 11(2): 108-114.
  7. Kim JM, Na MS, Jung KH, Lee SH, et al. The best-matched pure tone average and speech recognition threshold for different audiometric configurations. Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2016; 59(10): 725-729.
  8. Wong AC, Moore BC. "Temporary threshold shift and recovery." Audiology & Neurotology 2012: 17(1); 1-12.
  9. Chabuk A, Hammood ZA, Abed SA, Kadhim MM, et al. editors. Noise Level in Textile Industries: Case Study Al-Hillah Textile Factory-Company for Textile Industries, Al-Hillah-Babylon-Iraq. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; 2021: IOP Publishing.
  10. Ejigu M. Excessive sound noise risk assessment in textile mills of an Ethiopian-Kombolcha textile industry share company. International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering 2019; 8(2): 105-114.
  11. Golmohammadi R, Monazzam MR, Hashemi Z, Fard SMB. Pattern Evaluation of Noise Propagation at Various Units of a Textile Industry. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2014; 3(6): 106-113.
  12. Rubak T, Kock SA, Koefoed-Nielsen B, Bonde JP, Kolstad HA. The risk of noise-induced hearing loss in the Danish workforce. Noise and Health 2006; 8(31): 80-87.
  13. Zaw AK, Myat AM, Thandar M, Htun YM, et al. Assessment of noise exposure and hearing loss among workers in textile mill (Thamine), Myanmar: a cross-sectional study. Safety and Health at Work 2020; 11(2): 199-206.
  14. Sturman CJ, Frampton CM, Ten Cate WJ. Hearing loss asymmetry due to chronic occupational noise exposure. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39(8): e627-e34.
  15. Shahid A, Jamali T, Kadir MM. Noise induced hearing loss among an occupational group of textile workers in Karachi, Pakistan. Occup Med Health Aff 2018; 6(4): 282.
  16. Oleru U. Comparison of the hearing levels of Nigerian textile workers and a control group. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1980; 41(4): 283-287.
  17. Bedi R. Evaluation of occupational environment in two textile plants in Northern India with specific reference to noise. Ind health 2006; 44(1): 112-116.
  18. McCullagh M, Xu J, Dickson VV, Tan A, Lusk S. Noise exposure and quality of life among nurses. Workplace Health Saf  2022; 70(4): 207-219.
  19. O Khalid L, S Thaher G, J Kadhum H. Noise induced hearing loss in Basrah steel factory workers. The Medical Journal of Basrah University 2011; 29(1): 63-69.
  20. Masterson EA, Themann CL, Luckhaupt SE, Li J, Calvert GM. Hearing difficulty and tinnitus among US workers and non‐workers in 2007. Am J Ind Med 2016; 59(4): 290-300.
  21. Sriopas A, Chapman RS, Sutammasa S, Siriwong W. Occupational noise‐induced hearing loss in auto part factory workers in welding units in Thailand. J Occup Health 2017; 59(1): 55-62.     
  22. Buqammaz M, Gasana J, Alahmad B, Shebl M, Albloushi D. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss among migrant workers in Kuwait. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(10): 452-457.
  23. Zhou L, Ruan X, Wang T, Xie H, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of hearing loss associated with noise temporal structure among manufacturing workers. Front Integr Neurosci. 2022; 16: 978213.
  24. Shuster BZ, Depireux DA, Mong JA, Hertzano R. Sex differences in hearing: Probing the role of estrogen signaling. J Acoust Soc Am 2019; 145(6): 3656-3663.
  25. Nyarubeli IP, Tungu AM, Bråtveit M, Moen BE. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among Tanzanian iron and steel workers. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2020; 75(4): 216-225.
  26. Ertem M, İlcin E, Meric F. Noise Induced Hearing Loss Among CottonTextile and Carpet Mill Workers. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 1998; 28(5): 561-566.
  27. Tahira A, Ali W, Sadaf A, Shahzadi M, Ahsan U, Butt HS. Frequency of Noise Induced Hearing Loss in Textile Mill Workers. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences 2018; 12(1):101-103.
  28. Khadatkar A, Mehta C. Effect of age and duration of driving on hearing status of Indian agricultural tractor drivers. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control 2018; 37(4): 1037-1044.
Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 14, Issue 1
April 2025
Pages 42-56

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics