Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation

Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation

Artificial Intelligence in Rehabilitation sciences: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethics

Document Type : Review Article

Authors
1 PhD Candidate in Optometry, Department of Optometry, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Optometry, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Purpose:
The purpose of this article is to provide an analytical review of the applications of artificial intelligence in various branches of rehabilitation and to examine the challenges and ethical considerations associated with it in order to clarify the future development path of this technology in the service of patients with disabilities.
Methods:
In this review, relevant articles were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords related to artificial intelligence, machine learning, rehabilitation sciences, and bioethics. The search covered publications from January 2000 to June 2025. After removal of duplicates and screening for relevance, 28 studies were selected for content analysis and narrative synthesis.
Results:
The results of this study show that this technology, relying on machine learning, natural language processing, and complex data analysis, can be effective in all areas of rehabilitation science, including motor rehabilitation, cognitive rehabilitation, treatment effect prediction, personalized treatments, remote services, and assisting patients with independence. However, challenges such as lack of native data, information heterogeneity and the need for training and clinical acceptance of therapists, high costs, and legal considerations in the use of health data are still the main obstacles to the development of this technology.
Conclusion:
This technology has great potential to improve the quality of rehabilitation services and improve treatment outcomes for patients with disabilities. However, for the effective and responsible use of this technology, it is necessary to pay attention to ethical considerations such as algorithm transparency, equity in access, privacy, and protection of the rights of people with disabilities. Developing ethical frameworks, strengthening data infrastructure, and training therapists can pave the way for the sustainable development of artificial intelligence in rehabilitation science.

Keywords
Subjects

  1. Devi B, Neela V, Ashwitha A, Reddy C, et al. AI-Driven Predictive Models for Personalized Rehabilitation and Assistive Systems. 2025; 87-114.
  2. Espinoza Bernal VC, Hiremath SV. Classifying and tracking rehabilitation interventions through machine-learning algorithms in individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2021; 8: 20556683211044640.
  3. Mennella C, Maniscalco U, Pietro GD, Esposito M. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Future Rehabilitation Services: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 11024-1143.
  4. Mohammad Namdar M, Lowery Wilson M, Murtonen KP. How AI-Based Digital Rehabilitation Improves End-User Adherence: Rapid Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025; 12: e69763.
  5. Ye D, Schweighofer N, Luo H, Winstein C. Towards AI-based Precision Rehabilitation via Contextual Model-based Reinforcement Learning. medRxiv; 2025.
  6. Udayakumar D, Gopalakrishnan S, Raghuram A, Kartha A, et al. Artificial intelligence-powered smart vision glasses for the visually impaired. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025; 73(Suppl 3): S492-S497.
  7. Hope T, Portenoy J, Vasan K. SciSight: Combining faceted navigation and research group detection for COVID-19 exploratory scientific search. arXiv. 2020: arXiv: 2005. 12668.
  8. Biswas S. ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiology. 2023; 307(2): e230050.
  9. Berthold MR, Cebron N, Dill F. KNIME: The Konstanz Information Miner.  Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications: Springer. 2008; 319-326.
  10. Lee JY, Hovy EH. On the effectiveness of grammatical error correction: A qualitative study. Trans Assoc Comput Linguist. 2021; 9: 189-206.
  11. Zhao Y, Zhao H. Plagiarism detection using AI: A critical review. J Inf Sci. 2022; 48(2): 234-246.
  12. Lanotte F, O'Brien MK, Jayaraman A. AI in Rehabilitation Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges. Ann Rehabil Med. 2023; 47(6): 444-458.
  13. Chomutare T, Tejedor M, Svenning TO, et al. Artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare: a theory-based scoping review of barriers and facilitators. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(23):16359.
  14. Rehburg F, Graefe A, Hübner M, Thun S. How Interoperability Can Enable Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024; 316: 596-600.
  15. Han H. Challenges of reproducible AI in biomedical data science. BMC Med Genomics. 2025; 18(1): 8.
  16. Aldhahi MI, Alorainy AI, Abuzaid MM, Gareeballah A, et al. Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Rehabilitation: Perceptions, Knowledge, and Challenges Among Healthcare Providers. Healthcare. 2025; 13(4): 350.
  17. Hafeez M, Haq MZU, Tahzeem Z, Rahim S, Rao N. Ai Associated Challenges To Physical Therapy Profession. Insights J Health Rehabil. 2024; 2(2): 531-538.
  18. Sumner J, Lim HW, Chong LS, Bundele A, et al. Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review. Artif Intell Med. 2023; 146: 102693.
  19. El Arab RA, Abu-Mahfouz MS. Bridging the Gap: From AI Success in Clinical Trials to Real-World Healthcare Implementation-A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2025; 13(7).
  20. Zhang Y. Application of AI technology in the field of rehabilitation therapy. Adv Eng Innov. 2025.
  21. Shaik MA, Anik FI, Hasan MM, Chakravarty S, et al. Advancing Remote Monitoring for Patients with Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: Systematic Review. JMIR Aging. 2025; 8: e69175.
  22. Morley J, Machado CCV, Burr C, Cowls J, et al. The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 260: 113172.
  23. London AJ. Artificial Intelligence and Black-Box Medical Decisions: Accuracy versus Explainability. Hastings Cent Rep. 2019; 49(1): 15-21.
  24. Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai VI. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1): 310.
  25. Bottomley D, Thaldar D. Liability for harm caused by AI in healthcare: an overview of the core legal concepts. Front pharmacol. 2023; 14: 1297353.
  26. Fotheringham K, Smith H. Accidental injustice: Healthcare AI legal responsibility must be prospectively planned prior to its adoption. Future Health J. 2024; 11(3): 100181.
  27. Nunez Duffourc M, Giovanniello DS. The Autonomous AI Physician: medical ethics and legal liability. Law, AI and Ethics. Cham: Springer; 2023.
  28. V D. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: designing AI for human values. ITU J ICT Discov. 2018; 1(2): 1-8.