Providing a New Parameter to Indicate the foot Alignment in People with Flat Feet

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 MSc, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 MSc, Department of Orthotics and Prosthetics, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Flatfoot is characterized based on the height of medial longitudinal arch of foot relative to the ground. The most common methods employed to evaluate the severity of flatfoot and influences of foot insole on alignment of foot structure in static situation are foot print method and application of X-ray. However, both of them have some limitations and cannot be used during walking while subject uses insole. Therefore, the aim of this research was to find a parameter which represents the alignment of foot structure while walking.
Methods:
Two groups of normal and flat arch subjects were recruited in this study. The location of center of ankle joint (COJ) and center of pressure (COP) while walking was obtained by application of Qualysis motion analysis system and a force plate. The area between COP and COJ in the medial side to total area was the new parameter used in the present study.
Results:
The mean value of the new parameter was 74.65±7.15 and 91.86±12.4 for normal and flatfoot subjects, respectively. It seems that the new parameter can be used to check the alignment of foot structure during walking.
Conclusion:
In flat arch subjects, the center of pressure located in the medial side. In contrast, in normal subjects the COP located mostly in the lateral side. Using foot insole translates the COP from medial side to lateral side. 

Keywords

References

1. Preston ET. Flat foot deformity. Am Fam Physician 1974; 9(2): 143-7.
2.  Meehan RE, Brage M. Adult acquired flat foot deformity: clinical and radiographic examination. Foot Ankle Clin 2003; 8(3): 431-52.
3. Bertani A, Cappello A, Benedetti MG, Simoncini L, Catani F. Flat foot functional evaluation using pattern recognition of ground reaction data. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1999; 14(7): 484-93.
4. Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004; 19(4): 391-7.
5. Akbari M, Mohammadi M, Saeedi H. Effects of rigid and soft foot orthoses on dynamic balance in females with flatfoot. Journals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2007; 21: 91-7.
6. Otman S, Basgöze O, Gökce-Kutsal Y. Energy cost of walking with flat feet. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 1988; 12(2): 73-6.
7. Branthwaite HR, Payton CJ, Chockalingam N. The effect of simple insoles on three-dimensional foot motion during normal walking. Clinical Biomechanics 2004; 19(9): 972-7.
8.  Carcia CR, Drouin JM, Houglum PA. The influence of a foot orthotic on lower extremity transverse plane kinematics in collegiate female athletes with pes planus. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2006; 5: 646-55.
9. Kulthanan T, Techakampuch S, Bed ND. A study of footprints in athletes and non-athletic people. J Med Assoc Thai 2004; 87(7): 788-93.
10. Nikolaidou M, Boudolos K. A footprint-based approach for the rational classification of foot types in young schoolchildren. The Foot 2006; 16: 82-90.
11. Reel S, Rouse S, Vernon W, Doherty P. Reliability of a two-dimensional footprint measurement approach. Sci Justice 2010; 50(3):113-8.
12. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987; 20(5): 547-51.
13. Chen CH, Huang MH, Chen TW, Weng MC, Lee CL, Wang GJ. The correlation between selected measurements from footprint and radiograph of flatfoot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87(2): 235-40.
14. Wearing SC, Hills AP, Byrne NM, Hennig EM, Mcdonald M. The arch index: a measure of flat or fat feet? Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25(8): 575-81.
15. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2: 22.
16. Ledoux, William R., and Howard J. Hillstrom. "The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet." Gait & posture 2002; 15(1): 1-9.
17. Queen, Robin M., Nathan A. Mall, James A. Nunley, and Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong. "Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks." Gait & posture 2009; 29(4): 582-586.
18. Esrafilian, Amir, Mohammad Taghi Karimi, Mohammad JafarSadigh, Nima Jamshidi, and Pouya Amiri. "A New Approach to Measure Stability during Quiet Standing." International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological & Environmental Engineering 2012; 34: 101.
19. Ramanathan AK, Kiran P, Arnold GP, Wang W, Abboud RJ. Repeatability of the Pedar-X in-shoe pressure measuring system. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2010; 16(2): 70-3.
20. Quesada P, Rash G, Jarboe N. Assessment of pedar and F-Scan revisited. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 1997; 12(3): S15.
Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 4, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
December 2015
Pages 14-19

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics