Comparison of the Speech and Reading Rate in Mono and Farsi-Kurdish Bilingual of Third Grade Elementary Students

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Msc in speech therapy, Department of speech therapy, university of welfare and rehabilitation sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Msc in speech therapy, Department of speech therapy, Isfahan university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Bs in speech therapy, Department of speech therapy, university of welfare and rehabilitation sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Speech rate is one of the main characteristics of speech fluency and it affects speech intelligibility and communication. Intervention for normal speech rate in language disorders, fluency disorders, dysarthria, and apraxia is one of the responsibilities of speech and language pathologists. Effective intervention needs knowledge of normal speech rate in the target language. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine and compare speech and reading rate in monolingual and bilingual third grade students.
Methods:
Forty Persian monolingual students in the third grade (22 boys, 18 girls) and 50 Kurdish- Persian bilingual students (40 boys and 10 girls) were recruited after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Afterwards, free and descriptive speech and reading were elicited. Reading, free and descriptive and speech rate were calculated. SPSS software 16 and independent t- test for data analysis were used.
Results:
The mean score for free, descriptive speech and reading in monolingual students were 108 (25.31), 103(21.75) and 79.14(23) words per minute, respectively. In addition, the mean score for bilingual students were 90.3(13.88), 89.91(19.20), 87.55(23.66) words per minute, respectively. There were no significant differences between the rate of reading in mono and bilingual students, however, there was a significant difference between rate of free and descriptive speech in monolinguals and bilinguals. The rate of free and descriptive speech were faster in monolinguals than bilinguals. 
Conclusion:
While bilingual students demonstrate higher rate in reading, they obtained lower score in descriptive and free speech. A possible explanation for this result might be related to descriptive and free speech, therefore, it may be assumed that bilingual students require more time for making decision about what to say and how to say in their second language.   

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Guitar B. Stuttering: An integrated approach to its nature and treatment. 3rd Edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 193-194. 
  2. Steinberg M. fluency and speech rate in children whit localization-related epilepsy: correlations with fMRI profiles. Thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. University of Maryland; 2010: 17-20. 
  3. Sturm J, seery C. speech and articulatory rates of school-age children in conversation and narrative contexts. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch  2007; 38(1): 47-59.
  4. Verhoeven J, De Pauw G, Hanne K. Speech Rate in a Pluricentric Language: A Comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech 2004; 47(3): 297-308.
  5. Ignatius S. Kinematic Characteristics of Speaking Rate in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy: A Preliminary Study. J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2013; 20(4): 88–94.
  6. Hustad KC, Gorton K, Lee J. Classification of speech and language profiles in 4-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a prospective preliminary study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010; 53:1496–1513.
  7. Campbell T, DollaghanC. Speaking rate, articulatory speed, andlinguistic processing in children and adolescents with severe traumatic braininjury. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1995; 38(4): 864-875. 
  8. Wertzner H, Silva L. Speech rate in children with and without phonologicaldisorder. Pro-FonoRevista de AtualizacaoCientifica2009; 21(1): 19-24.
  9. Yaruss J, ContureE. Mother and child speaking rates and utterance lengths in adjacent fluent utterances: preliminary observations. J fluency disord 1995; 20(3): 257-278.
  10. Venkatagiri H. clinical measurement of rate of reading and discourse in young adults . J fluency disord 1999; 24(3): 209-226.
  11. Ahadi H, Shahbodaghi M, Faghihzadeh S, Mahmoudi Bakhtiari B. Rate of speech and reading in second and fifth grade primary students in Tehran.J Audiology 2006; 15 (2). 30-37.[Persian] 
  12. Leadholm B, Miller J. language sample analysis: The Wisconsin guide (Bulletin No. 92424). Madison, WI: Wisconsin department of public instruction 1994;16-24.
  13.  Pindzola R, Jenkins M, Lokken K. speaking rate of young children. Lang Speech Hear ServSch1989; 20(2): 133-138. 
  14. Walker J, Archibald L, Cherniak S, Fish V. Articulation rate in 3-and 5-year-old children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1992; 35(1): 4-13. 
  15. Hall K, Amir O, Yairi E. A longitudinal investigation of speaking rate in preschool children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42(6): 1367-1377.
  16.  Ryan B. Articulation, language, rate, and fluency characteristics of stuttering and nonstuttering preschool children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1992; 35(2): 333-342.
  17.  Andrews G, Ingham RJ. stuttering: consideration in the evaluation of treatment.Int J Lang Commun Disord 1971; 6(2): 129-138. 
  18. Duchin S, Mysak E. disfluency and rate characteristics of young adult, middle-age, and older males. J. Commun. Disord. 1987; 20(3): 245-257. 
  19. Tsao YC, Weismer G. interspeaker variation in habitual speaking rate: Evidence for a neuromuscular component. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40(4): 858-866.
  20. Kowal S, Oconnell D, Sabin E. Development of temporal patterning and vocal hesitation in spontaneous narratives J Psycholinguist Res 1975; 4(3): 195-207.
  21. Boutsen F, Hood S.B Determination of speech rate and fluency in fast and slow speaking normally fluent children. In w. Hulstijn, H. F. M. Peters, P. H. H. M. Van Leishout (Eds.), speech production: motor control, brain research, and fluency disorder. Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier 1997:557-564.
  22. Talebikharaji M. MostakhdemRastgu M.  Speech rate syllables in 6 to 11 children in Tehran. [Ms.thesis], Tehran. Iran university of Medical sciences, 1996.[Persian] 
  23. Mehdipour N, Kamali Sh. The study of some aspects of speech and language development [Bs.thesis], Tehran. Iran university of Medical sciences, 1998. [Persian]
  24. George Saunders. Bilingual Children: From Birth to Teens. 2nd ed. Multilingual matters; 1988:5-10.
  25. Gunter, MM. The A to Z of the kurds. UK: Scarecrow.2003.https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0810863340
  26. Ahmadkhani MR, Najafiyan A, Kamari MR. Comparative Study of the Status and Use of Persian and Kurdish Bilinguals in ShirvaniCherdavel. Language Related Research 2015; 5(5).43-63.
  27. Chen H, Leung Y. Patterns of lexical processing in a nonnative language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989; 15(2): 397-401.
  28.  Bialystok E, Craik FIM, Luk G. Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control. J. Neurolinguist. 2008; 21(6): 522-538.
  29. Hermans D, Bongaerts T, de Bot K, Schreuder R. Producing words in a foreign language: Can speaker’s prevent interference from their first language. Biling. Lang. Cogn.1998; 1(3): 213–230.
  30. Gollan T, AcenasL. What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2004; 30(1): 246-269.
Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 6, Issue 1
February 2017
Pages 75-82

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics