An Investigation of Output Information Quality of Laboratory Information Subsystem in Teaching Hospitals Laboratories in Shiraz, from the Users’ Viewpoints

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Health Information Management PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Health Information Management and Technology, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 MSc of Health Information Technolog , Ferdous Paramedical Facualty, Birjand University of medical Science, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Laboratory plays an important role in diseases treatment and prevention.  As a result, information systems can improve health organization performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the output information quality of Laboratory Information Subsystem in teaching hospital laboratories in Shiraz.
Methods:
This was a descriptive cross- sectional study. The study population consisted of all laboratory staffs in teaching hospitals. Data collection tool was the questionnaire, with its validity and reliability was measured before. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and SPSS software.
Results:
The results showed that output information of Laboratory Information Subsystem had favorable quality in relevance, accuracy, reliability, safety and speed dimensions with maximum frequency percent respectively 44.3, 51.7, 55.7, 57.2, 56.7, but in the economic dimension of output information with 64.2 frequency percent had partly favorable quality. Total average (3.11) from (1-5) scale showed that output information of Laboratory Information Subsystem had a high quality.
Conclusion:
Theoutput information of these systems is an important step in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, more attention to reinforce the quality of output information prevent from costs and duplication in the health care sector.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Nematollahi M, Kharmandar H, Ameripoor MR. Evaluating the Performance of the Laboratory Information System of Public Hospitals in Shiraz, 2011. MEDIA 2012; 3(3): 9 -16.
  2. Sadooghi F, Saedi MG, Meraji M, kimiafar k, Ghorbani NR. Health Information Management Technology 1, editor. tehran: Publications Jafari; 2011: 93-4. [Persian]
  3. Asadi F, Moghaddasi H, Mastaneh Z. Situation analysis of hematology information systems in educational- therapeutic hospital laboratories of Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Health Inf Manage 2009; 6(1): 11-21. [Persian]
  4. Skobelev D, Zaytseva T, Kozlov A, Perepelitsa V, Makarova A. Laboratory information management systems in the work of the analytic laboratory. Measurement Techniques 2011; 53(10): 1182-9.
  5. Nyasulu PS, Paszko C, Mbelle N. A narrative review of the laboratory information system and its role in antimicrobial resistance surveillance in south africa. Advances in Microbiology 2014; 4(10): 692- 6.
  6. Hosseini A, Moghaddasi H, Asadi F, Hemati M. Situational Analysis of Anatomical Pathology Laboratory Information Systems in Educational-Therapeutic Hospitals Affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Health Information Management 2011; 8(2): 208-17. [Persian]
  7. Johnes S. Clinical Laboratory Pearls. 1st, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000: 559.
  8. McClatchy K. Clinical Laboratory Medicine. 2nd, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002: 123.
  9. Khajouei R, Isfahani SS, Jahanbakhsh M, Mirmohammadi M. Assessment of the Performance of the Laboratory Information System (LIS) Based on the Standards of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics Medical Informatics Research Center 2015; 2(1): 8-16. [Persian]
  10. Desikan P, Koram MR, Trivedi SK, Jain A. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the laboratory information system (LIS) with special reference to the microbiology laboratory. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2005; 48(3): 418. PubMed PMID: 16761776. Epub 2006/06/10. eng. 
  11. Walter H. Information System Issues Facing Clinical Laboratories Serving Complex Integrated Delivery Systems. journal of healthcare information management 2000; 14(3): 55-68.
  12. Sepulveda JL, Young DS. The ideal laboratory information system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013; 137(8): 1129-1140.
  13. Saeedi P, Pournabavi A. Effectiveness of Management Information Systems (MIS) in Industrial Estates Companies. Journal of Modern Industrial/Organization Psychology 2010; 1(4): 65-75. [Persian]
  14. Rahnavard F, Arshadi J. Investigate the effectiveness management information systems (MIS) Department of Development and Engineering telecommunications company East Azarbaijan.  Second National Conference on Technology Management Isfahan University of Technology 2005. [Persian]
  15. Nematollahi M, Sharifian R, Parvin S. Evaluating the Hospital Information System at Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, from the Users’ Viewpoints. MEDIA 2012; 3(2):2-9.
  16. Delavi MR, Ghorbani H, Simakani F. Assessment of Hospital Information System: Ten Governmental Hospitals under Supervision of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2012. Health Inf Manage 2013; 10(1): 1-11. [Persian]
  17. Karami M, Safdari R, Soltani A. Patient's information rights: strategies for information security in the electronic environment. Medical Ethics Journal 2013;7(25).83-96. [Persian]
  18. Moghaddasi H. Information quality in health care. 1, editor. Shiraz: Word processor; 2012: 36-56. [Persian]
  19. Park WS, Yi SY, Kim SA, Song JS, Kwak YH. Association between the implementation of a laboratory information system and the revenue of a general hospital. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129(6): 766-71. PubMed PMID: 15913425. Epub 2005/05/26. eng.
  20. Derakhshani J, Vahedi M. Evaluate of hospital information system effectiveness, case study teaching hospitals in Tabriz. Health image 2015; 6(2): 1-7. [Persian]

Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation
Volume 6, Issue 1
February 2017
Pages 91-98

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics