Investigation of the Relation between Expressive Grammar and Theory of Mind In Children with High Functioning Autism

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Linguistics, Institute of Linguistics, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose:
Nowadays, there is an increasing interest in investigating the relation between language and theory of mind in children with autism. However, until now the nature of this relation is not fully understood, because findings of such an investigation in these children have been inconclusive, and even less is known about the direction of effect and the most effective component of language on theory of mind. The present study examined the relation between expressive grammar and theory of mind in 10 Persian children with high functioning autism between ages 6 to 9 years and 20 typically developing controls.
Methods:
In this study, research data were collected from 10 children with autism and 20 normal children (10 age-matched and 10 language-matched). Initially, we used screening and diagnosing test for diagnosing children with high-functioning autism. Then, expression of different structures of syntax and their ability in theory of mind were respectively assessed by using expressive grammar and theory of mind tests. Finally, data were analyzed with correlation tests using SPSS statistical software. 
Results:
Our results showed that in language-matched group, significant correlation was found between total score of correct structure and correct tasks, and third level of theory of mind. However, in children with autism and age-matched normal children; no significant correlation was observed. For depth understanding of this relation in children with autism, we compared this relation in specific structures and found that there is a significant correlation between expression of adverbial relative clause and personal ending, and second level of theory of mind and total score of theory of mind.
Conclusions:
Therefore, for analyzing the relation between language and theory of mind in children with autism, it is necessary to compare different structures separately, and in cognitive therapy (treatment for improving the theory of mind), we should pay attention to grammatical structures such as relative clause and personal ending.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Baron-Cohen S, Scott FJ, Carrie Allison C, Williams J, Bolton P, Matthews FE, Brayne C. Prevalence of autism-spectrum conditions: UK school-based population study. British Journal of Psychiatry 2009; 194(6): 500-9.
  2.  Frith U, Happe F, & Siddons F. Autism and theory of mind in everyday life. Social Development 1994; 3(2): 108-124.
  3.  Mathersul D, McDonald S, & Rushby, J. A. Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2013; 35(6): 655-668.
  4.  Sheinkop FSJ. Hot Topics in Autism: Cognitive Deficits, Cognitive Style, and Joint Attention Dysfunction. Medicin and Health/ Rhode Island 2005; 88 (5): 152-153.
  5.  Dennett DC. Beliefs about beliefs. In Behavioural and Brain Sciences 1978; 1(4): 568-570.
  6.  Tager-Flusberg, H. Evaluating the theory-of-mind hypothesis of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2007; 16(6); 311-316.
  7.  Vesterinen JT. The TOM Storybooks as a tool of studying children's Theory of mind in finland. Master’s thesis of psychology, University of Jyvaskyla. 2008.
  8.  Ghamarani A, Alborzi S, Khayer M, Validity and Reliability of the theory of mind test (TOM TEST) for use in Iran. Journal of Psychology 2010; 10(2): 181-199.
  9.  Astington J, Jenkins J. A longitudinal study of the relationbetween language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental psychology 1999; 35(5): 1311-1320.
  10.  ager-Flusberg H, and R Joseph. How language facilitates the acquisition of false-belief understanding in children with autism. In Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. J. Astington and J. Baird. Oxford, Oxford University Press 2005; 298-318.
  11. Smith N, Hermelin B, Tsimpli, I. Dissociation of social affect and theory of mind in a case of Asperger syndrome. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2003; 15(1): 303-322.
  12.  Fisher, N., & Happe, F. A training study of theory of mind and executive function in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2005; 35(1): 757-771.
  13. Schick B, de Villiers P, de Villiers J, Hoffmeister R. Language and theory of mind: a study of deaf children. Child Developmental, 2007; 78(2): 376-96.
  14. Lind SE, Bowler DM. Language and theory of mind in autism spectrum disorder: the relationship between complement syntax and false belief task Performance. Journal of Autismand Developmental Disorders 2009; 39(6): 929-3716.
  15.  Paynter J, Peterson C. Language and TOM development in autism versus Asperger syndrome: contrasting influences of syntactic versus lexical /semantic maturity. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 2010; 4(3):377-85.
  16. Mansuri, M, Chalabianloo GH R, Maleki Rad AA, Mosaded AA. The comparison of factors affecting the theory of mind development in autistic and normal children. Arak Medical University Journal 2011; 13(53): 115-125. [Persian]
  17.  Heidari T, Sfahmive A, Framarzi S. The Comparison Theory of Mind Dimension in Autism Children and Normal Children Isfahan City .Knowledge and research in Applied psychology 2011; 12 (45): 64-70. [Persian]
  18.  Arefi M, GhaeniHesaroye M, Ebrahimpour F. Comparing the Ability of the Theory of Mind between Deaf and Hearing 9-11 Years Old Children. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology 2013, 14(1): 63-71. [Persian]
  19. Ahmadi S J, Safari T, Hemmatian M, &KhaliliZ. The psychometric properties of Gilliam Autism Rating Scale. (GARS).Researches of Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences 2011; 1(1): 87-104. [Persian]
  20. Kasechi M. Validity and reliability of Persian version of Autism spectrum screening questionnaire. University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation 2010; 41 (2): 206-22. [Persian]
  21. Haresabadi F, Shirazi TH, Ebadi A, Kazemi MD. Design and validation of a Photographic Expressive Persian Grammar Test for children aged 4–6 years. Journal of Child Language and Teaching therapy 2016; 32(2):193-204.