1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Speech-Language Pathology Medical Review Guideline. Wash; 2008:111-114.
2. Van Doorn J. Purcell A. Nasalance Levels in the Speech of Normal Australian Children. Cleft Palate –Craniofacial J 1998; 35(4): 40-45.
3. Zojaji R, Yousefi J, .Khaki M. Efficacy of nasometer in evaluation of patient with hyper nasality. Journal ofMedical Science 2005; 2:13-18.
4. Van Lierde K, Wuyts F, Bodt D, Van Cauwenberge P .Nasometric Values for Normal Nasal Resonance in the Speech of Young Flemish Adults. Cleft Palate–Craniofacial J 2001; 38(2): 26-28.
5. Sweeney T, Sell D, O'Regan M. Nasalance scores for for normal_ speakingirish children. Cleft palate craniofacial j 2004; 41(2): 56-59.
6. Razmju Z. Making Persian texts to assess speech in normal children aged 8-12 years Nasality and Determine the reliability and validity M.Sc. Thesis. Tehran University of medical Sciences; 2005: 84-93. [Persian]
7. Sadjadi V, Ghorbani A, Torabi nezhad F, Amiri Shavaki Y, Keyhani MR, Effects of vocal loudness on vowel nasalance among normal Farsi-speaking students with the age range of 18-28 years, Recearch in Rehabilitation Sciences j 2010; 6(1): 33-37. [Persian]
8. KayPENTAX. Nasometer II Instruction Manual 2010.
9. Nichols A, Nasalance stastics for two Mexican populations, Cleft Palate–Craniofacial J january1999; 36(1): 117-119.
10 Lee A, Browne U. Nasalance scores for typical Irish English-speaking adults. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J 2004; 41(2): 168-174.
11. Abou-Elsaad T. Quriba A. Baz H. Elkassaby R.Standardization of Nasometry for Normal Egyptian Arabic Speakers. Folia Phoniatr Logop j 2012; 64 (6): 83-86.
12. Ghelichi L, Amiri-e-Shavaki Y, Jenabi M, Khorasani B. The effect of phonological context on nasalance of voice in the word. J rehabilitation 2005; 6 (2): 29-33. [Persian]
13. Brunnega K, Van Doorn J .Normative data on nasalance scores for Swedish as measured on the Nasometer: Influence of dialect, gender, and age Clin Linguist Phon 2009; 23 (1):58-69.
14. Kendrick, K R. Louisiana State University Nasalance Protocol Standardization. B.A., Louisiana State University; 2004: 492-517
15. Watterson T, York SL, Mc Farlane SC. Effects of vocal loudness on nasalance measures. Journal od communication disorders 1994; 27: 257-262.
16. Dalston RM, Seaver EJ. Relative values of various standardized passages in thenasometric assessment of patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992; 29:17–21.
17. Seaver EJ and et al. A study of nasometric values for normalnasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34(4): 715-21.
18. Hutchinson JM, KL Robinson, and MA Nerbonne. Patterns of nasalance in a sample of normal gerontologic subjects. J Commun Disord 1978; 11(6): 469-81.
19. Tachimura T and et al. Nasalance score variation in normaladult Japanese speakers of Mid-West Japanese dialect. Cleft PalatCraniofac J, 2000; 37(5): 463-7.
20. Litzaw LL, and RM Dalston. The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. J Common Disord 1992; 25(1): 55-64.
21. Karakoc O and et al. Nasalance scores for normal-speaking Turkish population. The Journal ofcraniofacial surgery 2013; 24(2):125-29.
22. Prathanee B1, Thanaviratananich S, Pongjunyakul A, Rengpatanakij K. Nasalance scores for speech in normal Thai children. Scandinavian Surgery Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 2003; 37(6): 351-5.
23. Leeper, H.A., A.P. Rochet, and I.A. MacKay. Characteristics of Nasalance in Canadian Speakers of English and French. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Banff, Alberta, Canada; 1992: 447-453.